Anyway they are trying to profile their students better in
order to know who they are and what needs they have. One of the survey sections
was about socio-economic group. It gave a list of devices/perks and you had to
check whether you had said item or not. It ranged from a swimming pool and Dstv
(our local satellite TV provider) all the way down to a flush toilet and
running water. It felt strange to me that you would judge a person’s socio economic
position like this. What would they think of me? My husband and I are both
earning a decent income and with no dependents yet we do well (compared to most
people in SA). We, however, do not own a TV, a tumble dryer, smartphone, and a
couple of other items listed at the higher end. Does the absence of these items
automatically drop us into a lower socio-economic group? Or maybe the fact that
we have consciously cut these items means that we are capable of living
according to a higher standard otherwise, ie most items we don’t own are fairly
pricey and the Dstv for instance is a monthly expense of about R800.
Then I wondered, if it is that abnormal for us not to own
these items? Is moving up the economic ladder seen as an automatic accumulation
of items? Perhaps ending with a 10 bedroom McMansion and a large pool?
My Mcmansion - Um, no thanks
Clearly based on this survey it is. I resent the fact that
it is assumed that as soon as you are capable you will invest in a smart phone
or a swimming pool. Being well-off shouldn’t be about these items, I feel it is
more about being able to provide yourself and loved ones with decent health
care, schooling and security. Investing in happiness through self-actualisation,
holidays and time spent together (and actually conversing, not parked on the
couch).
Sometimes I reflect how lucky we are not to be swept up in
this mainstream material world. Lucky that we judge our success not on the
things we own but on the things we are capable of doing. I love my hubby, he loves
me, we are looking forward to making it three and that is more than enough.
No comments:
Post a Comment